Initiated By
FINRA
Allegations
SECTION 17(A) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, SECTION 10(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND RULE 10B-5 THEREUNDER, NASD RULES 2110, 2120, 2210 AND 3010: RESPONDENT RAYMOND LEE NORAGON KNEW, OR RECKLESSLY DISREGARDED, THAT THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT OFFERING DOCUMENTS AND MARKETING MATERIALS SUPPLIED BY A HEDGE FUND MANAGER, AND USED BY HIS MEMBER FIRM'S SALESMEN TO SOLICIT CUSTOMERS TO PURCHASE THE HEDGE FUND AND ITS GENERAL PARTNER, CONTAINED MATERIALLY FALSE AND MISLEADING INFORMATION AND OMISSIONS OF MATERIAL FACT. WITHOUT FURTHER INVESTIGATION, NORAGON RELIED ON THE HEDGE FUND'S MANAGER'S CLAIMS THAT TEST RESULTS CONTAINED IN SALES MATERIAL WERE BASED ON MORE THAN HYPOTHETICAL RETURNS, AND PERMITTED SALESMEN TO MAKE THE SAME REPRESENTATIONS TO THEIR CUSTOMERS. NORAGON DID NOT QUESTION THE USE OF AN OUTDATED PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM (PPM) AND DID NOT TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO INVESTIGATE DISPARITIES BETWEEN INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE HEDGE FUND MANAGER, THE PPM AND SALES MATERIAL; DID NOT DETERMINE WHETHER OTHER PARTNERS WERE INVOLVED IN THE MANAGEMENT OF THE HEDGE FUND; PERMITTED SALESMEN TO INCLUDE OUTDATED INFORMATION ABOUT THE HEDGE FUND'S MANAGEMENT IN THEIR SALES PITCHES TO CUSTOMERS; AND DID NOT REQUEST COPIES OF THE HEDGE FUND'S AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, EVEN THOUGH THE HEDGE FUND'S LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT REQUIRED THE HEDGE FUND TO PREPARE AND DISTRIBUTE ANNUAL AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR INVESTORS. NORAGON KNEW OF FRAUD ACTIONS AGAINST THE HEDGE FUND'S MANAGER, BUT DID NOT DISCLOSE THE ACTIONS TO HIS SALESMEN AND DID NOT REQUIRE THEM TO DISCLOSE THE ACTIONS TO THEIR CUSTOMERS, EVEN AFTER THE SALESMEN LEARNED OF THE FRAUD ACTIONS. NORAGON, WITHOUT TESTING THE VALIDITY OF THE MANAGER'S CLAIM THAT REGULATION D COULD BE BYPASSED BY INVESTING IN THE GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, PERMITTED SALESMEN TO REPRESENT THE GENERAL PARTNERSHIP AS AN INVESTMENT THAT WOULD PERMIT NON-ACCREDITED INVESTORS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE HEDGE FUND'S TRADING STRATEGY. NORAGON PERMITTED SALESMEN TO USE THE HEDGE FUND'S MISLEADING MARKETING MATERIALS TO SOLICIT CUSTOMERS TO PURCHASE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS IN THE GENERAL PARTNERSHIP. NORAGON AUTHORIZED THE SALE OF THE HEDGE FUND AND THE GENERAL PARTNERSHIP TO NON-ACCREDITED INVESTORS, CONTRARY TO HIS FIRM'S WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES THAT LIMITED THE SALE OF PRIVATE PLACEMENTS TO ACCREDITED INVESTORS AND INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS. IN ADDITION, CONTRARY TO HIS FIRM'S WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES, NORAGON FAILED TO CONDUCT A REASONABLE DUE DILIGENCE REVIEW AND FAILED TO ENSURE THE DISCLOSURE OF ALL MATERIAL INFORMATION RELATING TO THE HEDGE FUND AND THE GENERAL PARTNERSHIP.
Resolution
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Bar
Bar (Permanent)
Registration Capacities Affected
All Capacities
Duration
Indefinite
Start Date
10/7/2009
Regulator Statement
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, NORAGON CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTION AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, HE IS BARRED FROM ASSOCIATION WITH ANY FINRA MEMBER IN ANY CAPACITY.
THE SETTLEMENT INCLUDES A FINDING THAT NORAGON WILLFULLY VIOLATED SECTION 10(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND RULE 10B-5 THEREUNDER, AND THAT UNDER ARTICLE III, SECTION 4 OF THE FINRA BY-LAWS, THIS OMISSION MAKES HIM SUBJECT TO A STATUTORY DISQUALIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO ASSOCIATION WITH A MEMBER.