Initiated By
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT
Allegations
**07/01/2002** CHARGE I R. KENNETH LINDELL, BY REASON OF THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE STATEMENT OF FACTS AND EXPLANATION, VIOLATED EXCHANGE RULE 476(A), IN THAT HE ENGAGED IN CONDUCT INCONSISTENT WITH JUST AND EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES OF TRADE, BY MAKING FALSE REPRESENTATIONS TO A CUSTOMER OF HIS MEMBER FIRM EMPLOYER REGARDING THE CUSTOMER?S ACCOUNT VALUE, AND IS THEREFORE SUBJECT TO DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE RULE 476(A). CHARGE II VIOLATED EXCHANGE RULE 476(A), IN THAT HE ENGAGED IN CONDUCT INCONSISTENT WITH JUST AND EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES OF TRADE, BY PROVIDING A CUSTOMER WITH REPORTS WHICH CONTAINED FALSE AND MISLEADING INFORMATION REGARDING THE CUSTOMER?S ACCOUNT, CHARGE III VIOLATED EXCHANGE RULE 476(A), IN THAT HE ENGAGED IN CONDUCT INCONSISTENT WITH JUST AND EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES OF TRADE, BY EFFECTING ONE OR MORE TRANSACTIONS IN A CUSTOMER?S ACCOUNT WITHOUT THE CUSTOMER?S AUTHORIZATION, CHARGE IV VIOLATED EXCHANGE RULE 476(A), IN THAT HE ENGAGED IN CONDUCT INCONSISTENT WITH JUST AND EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES OF TRADE, BY FAILING TO FOLLOW A CUSTOMER?S INSTRUCTIONS TO OPEN AN ACCOUNT FOR THE CUSTOMER?S WIFE, CHARGE V CAUSED A VIOLATION OF EXCHANGE RULE 440, AND SEC REGULATION 240.17A-3, BY ALTERING PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS REPORTS TO CONTAIN FALSE AND MISLEADING INFORMATION, CHARGE VI VIOLATED EXCHANGE RULE 352(C), IN THAT HE OFFERED TO SHARE IN THE LOSSES OF A CUSTOMER ACCOUNT, CHARGE VII VIOLATED EXCHANGE RULE 346(B), IN THAT HE RECEIVED COMPENSATION FOR OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT FROM HIS MEMBER FIRM EMPLOYER, AND IS THEREFORE SUBJECT TO DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE RULE 476(A).
Resolution
Decision
Sanctions
Censure
Sanctions
Bar
Sanction Details
**02/11/2003** HPD# 02-222 ISSUED BY NYSE HEARING PANEL THE HEARING PANEL FOUND THAT MR. LINDELL VIOLATED EXCHANGE RULE 476(A) IN THAT HE ENGAGED IN CONDUCT INCONSISTENT WITH JUST AND EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES OF TRADE, BY PROVIDING A CUSTOMER REPORTS WHICH CONTAINED MISLEADING INFORMATION REGARDING THE CUSTOMER'S ACCOUNT. THE HEARING PANEL FOUND MR. LINDELL NOT GUILTY OF: MAKING FALSE REPRESENTATIONS TO A CUSTOMER; PROVIDING A CUSTOMER WITH REPORTS THAT CONTAINED FALSE INFORMATION; EFFECTING ONE OR MORE UNAUTHORIZED TRANSACTION; FAILING TO FOLLOW A CUSTOMER'S INSTRUCTIONS; CAUSING A VIOLATION OF EXCHANGE RULE 440 AND SEC REGULATION 240.17A-3; AND VIOLATING EXCHANGE RULE 352(C). PENALTY: CENSURE AND A THREE WEEK BAR.
Broker Comment
BECAUSE OF THE STATE OF MAINE'S REGUALTORY ACTION AGAINST MR LINDELL, THE NYSE OPENED ITS OWN INVESTIGATION INTO SIMILIAR CHARGES REGARDING THE SAME CLIENT, AND IN THAT INVESTIGATION HAS ALLEGED OTHER CHARGES NOT PREVIOUSLY INCLUDED IN THE STATE OF MAINE'S REGULATORY ACTION. LINDELL VIGOROUSLY DENIES ALL THESE CHARGES AND HAS REJECTED AN OFFER TO SETTLE THE MATTER. LINDELL INTENDS TO FIGHT THE CHARGES AT A FORMAL NYSE HEARING. THE FINAL DECISION OF THE NYSE WAS OUT OF THE 7 INITIAL CHARGES, 6 WERE DISMISSED AND MR. LINDELL WAS FOUND GUILY OF PROVIDING CUSTOMER WITH REPORTS THAT WERE MISLEADING BY NOT MARKING THE DOCUMENTS AS HYPOTHETICAL ILLUSTRATIONS, ALTHOUGH IT WAS THE OPINION OF THE PANEL THAT MR. LINDELL DID ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS ATTEMPT TO EXPLAIN TO THE CLIENT THAT THEY WERE. ALSO, THE REPORT IN QUESTION WAS GENERATED BY MR. LINDELL'S FORMER B/D'S INHOUSE SYSTEM.