Initiated By
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Allegations
SEC Admin Release 34-78772/IA Release 4522/September 6, 2016: The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it appropriate and in the public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ("Advisers Act") against Karl E. Hahn. On October 18, 2011, the New Hampshire Bureau of Securities Regulation ("Bureau") and Respondent executed a Consent Order (INV-2010000015). The Bureau permanently revoked Respondent's broker-dealer representative license with Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. and barred him from any securities licensure in New Hampshire. The Consent Order constitutes a final order of a State securities commission.
SEC Admin Release 34-78895, IA Release 40-4533, September 21, 2016 (CORRECTED ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS):
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it appropriate and in the public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ("Advisers Act") against Karl E. Hahn ("Respondent").
On October 18, 2011, the New Hampshire Bureau of Securities Regulation ("Bureau") and Respondent executed a Consent Order (INV-2010000015). The Bureau permanently revoked Respondent's broker-dealer representative license with Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. and barred him from any securities licensure in New Hampshire. The Consent Order constitutes a final order of a State securities commission.
Respondent agreed to findings of fact in the Consent Order which established violations of the securities laws. First, in 2008-2009, Respondent introduced three of his customers to his neighbor, an insurance agent, to purchase high-value life insurance policies. As a result of this introduction and the subsequent purchase of policies by his customers, Respondent's father, who lived with Respondent and otherwise had no involvement in the transaction, received $600,000 in commissions. Respondent did not disclose his father's receipt of the commissions to his customers, causing a conflict of interest about which his customers should have been made aware. In addition, Respondent, from March 2009 through April 2010, outside of his employment from Deutsche Bank and Oppenheimer, fraudulently induced a customer to make a $2,285,000 investment in a fictitious real estate investment, in which the customer lost his entire investment. In January 2011, while under oath, Respondent made material misstatements and concealed information from the Bureau about his involvement with this outside real estate investment.
Resolution
Order
Bar
Bar (Permanent)
Registration Capacities Affected
any broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, or NRSRO
Start Date
2/3/2017
Registration Capacities Affected
any offering of a penny stock
Start Date
2/3/2017