Initiated By
NYSE DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT
Allegations
** JANUARY 29, 1997 ** STIPULATION OF FACTS
AND CONSENT TO PENALTY FILED BY NYSE DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT
AND PENDING. CONSENTED TO FINDINGS: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR
DENYING GUILT, WESTMORELAND CONSENTS TO: a. FINDINGS BY THE
HEARING PANEL THAT HE: i) ENGAGED IN CONDUCT INCONSISTENT WITH
JUST AND EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES OF TRADE BY PURCHASING ANNUITIES
FOR CUSTOMERS OF ANOTHER REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE OF HIS
MEMBER ORGANIZATION EMPLOYER, WHICH OTHER REGISTERED
REPRESENTATIVE WAS NOT LICENSED TO SELL ANNUITIES, IMPROPERLY
PAYING COMMISSIONS, OR A PORTION OF COMMISSIONS, FOR THE
TRANSACTIONS TO THE OTHER REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE, AND
CAUSING THE BOOKS AND RECORDS OF HIS MEMBER ORGANIZATION
EMPLOYER TO FAIL TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THAT SUCH COMMISSIONS,
OR A PORTION OF SUCH COMMISSIONS, HAD BEEN PAID TO THE OTHER
REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE; AND ii) CAUSED A VIOLATION OF
REGULATIONS 240.17a-3 AND 240.17a-4 PROMULGATED UNDER THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND EXCHANGE RULE 440 BY
CAUSING INACCURATE ENTRIES TO BE MADE ON THE BOOKS AND RECORDS
OF HIS MEMBER ORGANIZATION EMPLOYER. b) THE IMPOSITION BY THE
EXCHANGE OF THE PENALTY OF A CENSURE AND A SUSPENSION FOR FOUR
WEEKS FROM MEMBERSHIP, ALLIED MEMBERSHIP, APPROVED PERSON
STATUS, AND FROM EMPLOYMENT OR ASSOCIATION IN ANY CAPACITY WITH
ANY MEMBER OR MEMBER ORGANIZATION.
Resolution
Stipulation and Consent
Sanctions
Censure
Sanctions
Suspension
Sanction Details
**4/9/97** DECISION 97-40 ISSUED BY NYSE HEARING
-2EL. PURCHASED ANNUITIES FOR CUSTOMERS OF ANOTHER REGISTERED
REPRESENTATIVE, PAID COMMISSIONS TO THE OTHER REGISTERED
REPRESENTATIVE, AND CAUSED THE BOOKS AND RECORDS OF HIS
EMPLOYER TO REFLECT INACCURACIES; AND CAUSED VIOLATION OF SEC
REGULATIONS 240.17a-3 and 240.17-4 AND EXCHANGE RULE 440 BY
CAUSING INACCURATE ENTRIES TO BE MADE ON THE BOOKS AND RECORDS
OF HIS EMPLOYER -- CONSENT TO CENSURE AND FOUR WEEK SUSPENSION.
Broker Comment
EARLY IN MY CAREER, AT THE REQUEST OF MY
SUPERVISOR/MENTOR, I SIGNED AS AGENT ON ANNUITY APPLICATIONS
THAT HE HAD RECOMMENDED TO HIS CLIENTS; MY SUPERVISOR/MENTOR AT
SHEARON LEHMAN BROTHERS HAD NOT COMPLETED THE INSURANCE
LICENSING PROCESS. HE WAS, HOWEVER, KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT THE
ANNUITY INVESTMENTS HE RECOMMENDED AND I BELIEVED HE SERVED THE
BEST INTERSTS OF HIS CLIENTS. BY SIGNING AS THE LICENSED AGENT,
THE ANNUITY COMMISSIONS WERE CREDITED TO ME BY SLB. I PAID TAX
ON THE INCOME I RECEIVED AND THEN PAID THE REMAINDER TO MY
MENTOR. THE ANNUITIES WERE ISSUED BY REPUTABLE COMPANIES AND TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE HAVE BEEN PROFITABLE INVESTMENTS FOR
HIS CLIENTS. ALTHOUGH THESE TRANSACTIONS WERE DONE WITH THE
BEST OF INTENTIONS ON MY PART. I NOW UNDERSTAND THAT I SHOULD
NOT HAVE PAID THOSE COMMISSIONS TO AN UNLICENSED AGENT. I
REGRET THIS OCCURRENCE AND WILL MAKE SURE THAT IT DOES NOT
HAPPEN AGAIN.